<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://sublinear.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=18.29.41.105</id>
	<title>Open Problems in Sublinear Algorithms - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sublinear.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=18.29.41.105"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sublinear.info/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/18.29.41.105"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T18:37:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.10</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://sublinear.info/index.php?title=Open_Problems:100&amp;diff=1371</id>
		<title>Open Problems:100</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sublinear.info/index.php?title=Open_Problems:100&amp;diff=1371"/>
		<updated>2023-03-09T06:50:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;18.29.41.105: Update with reference resolving problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Header&lt;br /&gt;
|source=wola19&lt;br /&gt;
|who=Oded Goldreich&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
For a probability distribution $p$ over a discrete domain $\Omega$, and a parameter $\varepsilon\in[0,1]$, denote by &lt;br /&gt;
\[&lt;br /&gt;
    \operatorname{ess}_\varepsilon(p) \stackrel{\rm def}{=} \min\{ \operatorname{supp}(q) : \operatorname{d}_{\rm TV}(p,q) \leq \varepsilon \}&lt;br /&gt;
\]&lt;br /&gt;
the $\varepsilon$-effective suport size of $p$, i.e., the smallest possible support size of any distribution $\varepsilon$-close to $p$. This turns out to be a more robust and interesting measure in general than the support of $p$, which is $\operatorname{ess}_0(p) = \operatorname{supp}(p)$. In recent work, Goldreich {{Cite|Goldreich-19b}} focused on the query complexity of approximating the effective support size of a discrete distribution provided via two oracles: sampling ($\textsf{samp}_p$), and query access (to the probability mass function), $\textsf{eval}_p$. In particular, the goal is, given parameters $\varepsilon$ and $\beta&amp;gt;1$, to output an $f(\varepsilon,\beta,n)$-factor approximation of $\operatorname{ess}_{\varepsilon'}(p)$, for some $\varepsilon' \in [\varepsilon,\beta\varepsilon]$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the aforementioned work, algorithms are obtained achieving (for constant $\beta&amp;gt;1$)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* query complexity $\operatorname{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ and approximation factor $f = O(\log\log\log\log(n/\varepsilon))$, that is, any constant number of iterated logarithms;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* query complexity $\operatorname{poly}(\log^\ast n, 1/\varepsilon)$ even for approximation factor $f = O(1)$;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where $n \stackrel{\rm def}{=} \operatorname{ess}_\varepsilon(p)$. (As well as several other results interpolating between the two extremes.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Question:''' Can one get the best of both worlds, and get rid of the $\log^\ast n$ to obtain query complexity $\operatorname{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ ''and'' constant approximation factor?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update ==&lt;br /&gt;
This problem has been resolved in the positive direction (https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.11344).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>18.29.41.105</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>