Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:95"
m (Krzysztof Onak moved page Waiting:Non-Adaptive Group Testing to Open Problems:95 without leaving a redirect) |
m (Updating the header) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header | {{Header | ||
− | |||
|source=wola19 | |source=wola19 | ||
|who=Oliver Gebhard | |who=Oliver Gebhard |
Revision as of 18:11, 26 August 2019
Suggested by | Oliver Gebhard |
---|---|
Source | WOLA 2019 |
Short link | https://sublinear.info/95 |
In (non-adaptive) quantitative group testing, one has a population of $n$ individuals, among which $k=n^c$ (for some constant $c\in(0,1)$) are sick. The goal is to identity the $k$ sick individuals by performing $m$ non-adaptive tests. In each test, one specifies a subset $S\subseteq [n]$ and learns whether $S$ contains one or more sick individuals.
By a counting argument, one gets a lower bound of $m = \Omega\bigl( \frac{k}{\log k}\log \frac{n}{k} \bigr)$ tests; however, the best known upper bound is $m = O( k\log \frac{n}{k} )$.
Question: Can one get rid of the $\log k$ factor in the lower bound; or, conversely, improve the upper bound to match it?