Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:102"
m |
m (Krzysztof Onak moved page Waiting:Making edges happy in the LOCAL model to Open Problems:102 without leaving a redirect) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header | {{Header | ||
− | |||
|source=wola19 | |source=wola19 | ||
|who=Jukka Suomela | |who=Jukka Suomela |
Latest revision as of 18:36, 26 August 2019
Suggested by | Jukka Suomela |
---|---|
Source | WOLA 2019 |
Short link | https://sublinear.info/102 |
In this question, the input is the underlying graph $G=(V,E)$, promised to have maximum degree at most $\Delta$, and the goal is to compute an orientation of the edges of $E$ which makes all edges “happy.” Specifically, for any given orientation of the edges, the load of a node $v\in V$ is its number of incoming edges. An edge $e$ is then said to be happy if switching its orientation does not make it point to a smaller-node load.
One can show by a greedy argument that there always exists an orientation making all edges happy. Moreover, a surprising result established that, in the LOCAL model, such a configuration could be found in $\operatorname{poly}(\Delta)$ rounds, independent of the number of nodes $n$. However, the question of the dependence on $\Delta$ remains wide open, as even a $\operatorname{poly}\!\log(\Delta)$ upper bound is not ruled out.
Question: What is the right dependence on $\Delta$? Can one show any lower polynomial lower bound, e.g., $\Delta^{0.1}$, $\sqrt{\Delta}$, or $\Delta$?