Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:62"
m (Krzysztof Onak moved page Waiting:Andrea Montanari to Open Problems:62) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header | {{Header | ||
− | |||
|source=bertinoro14 | |source=bertinoro14 | ||
|who=Andrea Montanari | |who=Andrea Montanari |
Latest revision as of 22:56, 13 June 2014
Suggested by | Andrea Montanari |
---|---|
Source | Bertinoro 2014 |
Short link | https://sublinear.info/62 |
Given a symmetric matrix $A$, we can think of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as maximizing $x^\top A x$ subject to $\|x\|=1$. If we also add the condition $x \ge 0$, this problem becomes NP-hard. We can define a convex relaxation:
\[ \max \operatorname{Tr}(WA) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad \operatorname{Tr}(W) = 1,\ \ W \ge 0,\ \ W \succeq 0. \]
Suppose that $A$ is a random matrix. In particular, set $A_{ij}$ to be i.i.d $N(0,1)$. Then empirical results show that the resulting $W$ is a rank-1 matrix, which means that we recover the optimal $x$ exactly.
Is this true in general? Note that we can prove that the solution is rank 1 if $A = v v^T + (\text{small amount of noise})$.