Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:69"
(Updating header) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header | {{Header | ||
| − | |||
|source=baltimore16 | |source=baltimore16 | ||
|who=Clément Canonne | |who=Clément Canonne | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | Let $p$ be an unknown (discrete) probability distribution over product space $[n]\times [n]$, and $\varepsilon\in(0,1]$. Suppose $p$ is ''$\varepsilon$-close to independent'' (in total variation distance), i.e. there exists a product distribution $q=q_1\times q_2$ on $[n]\times [n]$ such that | + | Let $p$ be an unknown (discrete) probability distribution over product space $[n]\times [n]$, and $\varepsilon\in(0,1]$. Suppose $p$ is ''$\varepsilon$-close to independent'' (in total variation distance), i.e., there exists a product distribution $q=q_1\times q_2$ on $[n]\times [n]$ such that |
$$ | $$ | ||
d_{\rm TV}(p,q) = \max_{S\subseteq [n]\times[n]} \left( p(S) - q(S)\right) \leq \varepsilon. | d_{\rm TV}(p,q) = \max_{S\subseteq [n]\times[n]} \left( p(S) - q(S)\right) \leq \varepsilon. | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
| − | Given access to independent samples drawn from $p$, the goal is to ''correct'' $p$, that is to provide access to independent samples from a distribution $\tilde{p}$ satisfying (with high probability): | + | Given access to independent samples drawn from $p$, the goal is to ''correct'' $p$, that is, to provide access to independent samples from a distribution $\tilde{p}$ satisfying (with high probability): |
| − | + | * $d_{\rm TV}(p,\tilde{p}) = O(\varepsilon)$ (i.e., the corrected distribution is faithful to the original one), | |
| − | + | * $\tilde{p} = \tilde{p}_1\times \tilde{p}_2$ (i.e., the corrected distribution is a product distribution), | |
with a ''rate'' as good as possible, where the rate is the number of samples from $p$ required to provide a single sample from $\tilde{p}$. | with a ''rate'' as good as possible, where the rate is the number of samples from $p$ required to provide a single sample from $\tilde{p}$. | ||
| − | Achieving a rate of $2$ is simple: drawing $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ from $p$ and outputting $(x_1,y_2)$ provides sample access to $\tilde{p} = p_1\times p_2$, which can be shown to be $3\varepsilon$-close to $p$ | + | Achieving a rate of $2$ is simple: drawing $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ from $p$ and outputting $(x_1,y_2)$ provides sample access to $\tilde{p} = p_1\times p_2$, which can be shown to be $3\varepsilon$-close to $p$ {{cite|BatuFFKRW-01}}. |
| − | '''Question:''' | + | '''Question 1:''' Is a rate $r < 2$ achievable? What about an amortized rate (to provide $q=o(n^2)$ samples from the same distribution $\tilde{p}$<ref>The restriction $o(n^2)$ comes from the fact that, after $n^2$ samples, one can actually learn the distribution $p$, and then compute a good corrected definition $\tilde{p}$ offline. Hence, the range of interest is when having to provide a number of samples negligible in front of what learning $p$ would require.</ref>)? |
| − | What about the same question, when relaxing the second item to only ask that $p$ be ''improved'': that is, to provide sample access to a distribution $\tilde{p}$ guaranteed to be $\frac{\varepsilon}{2}$-close to a product distribution? | + | '''Question 2:''' What about the same question, when relaxing the second item to only ask that $p$ be ''improved'': that is, to provide sample access to a distribution $\tilde{p}$ guaranteed to be $\frac{\varepsilon}{2}$-close to a product distribution? |
| − | '''Note:''' | + | '''Note:''' This question fits within the framework of “sampling improvers,” introduced in {{cite|CanonneGR-16}}. In this framework, given access to a probability distribution only close to having a desired property, one aims at providing access to corrected samples from a nearby distribution that exhibits this property. |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:36, 18 January 2016
| Suggested by | Clément Canonne |
|---|---|
| Source | Baltimore 2016 |
| Short link | https://sublinear.info/69 |
Let $p$ be an unknown (discrete) probability distribution over product space $[n]\times [n]$, and $\varepsilon\in(0,1]$. Suppose $p$ is $\varepsilon$-close to independent (in total variation distance), i.e., there exists a product distribution $q=q_1\times q_2$ on $[n]\times [n]$ such that $$ d_{\rm TV}(p,q) = \max_{S\subseteq [n]\times[n]} \left( p(S) - q(S)\right) \leq \varepsilon. $$
Given access to independent samples drawn from $p$, the goal is to correct $p$, that is, to provide access to independent samples from a distribution $\tilde{p}$ satisfying (with high probability):
- $d_{\rm TV}(p,\tilde{p}) = O(\varepsilon)$ (i.e., the corrected distribution is faithful to the original one),
- $\tilde{p} = \tilde{p}_1\times \tilde{p}_2$ (i.e., the corrected distribution is a product distribution),
with a rate as good as possible, where the rate is the number of samples from $p$ required to provide a single sample from $\tilde{p}$.
Achieving a rate of $2$ is simple: drawing $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ from $p$ and outputting $(x_1,y_2)$ provides sample access to $\tilde{p} = p_1\times p_2$, which can be shown to be $3\varepsilon$-close to $p$ [BatuFFKRW-01].
Question 1: Is a rate $r < 2$ achievable? What about an amortized rate (to provide $q=o(n^2)$ samples from the same distribution $\tilde{p}$[1])?
Question 2: What about the same question, when relaxing the second item to only ask that $p$ be improved: that is, to provide sample access to a distribution $\tilde{p}$ guaranteed to be $\frac{\varepsilon}{2}$-close to a product distribution?
Note: This question fits within the framework of “sampling improvers,” introduced in [CanonneGR-16]. In this framework, given access to a probability distribution only close to having a desired property, one aims at providing access to corrected samples from a nearby distribution that exhibits this property.
- ↑ The restriction $o(n^2)$ comes from the fact that, after $n^2$ samples, one can actually learn the distribution $p$, and then compute a good corrected definition $\tilde{p}$ offline. Hence, the range of interest is when having to provide a number of samples negligible in front of what learning $p$ would require.
