Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:11"
m (1 revision) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Header |
− | + | |title=Counting Triangles | |
− | | | + | |source=kanpur06 |
− | | | + | |who=Stefano Leonardi |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
Given a stream in which edges are inserted and deleted to/from an unweighted, undirected graph, how well can we count triangles and other sub-graphs? Most of the previous work has focussed on the case of insertions {{cite|BarYossefKS-02|JowhariG-05|BuriolFLMS-06}} although it appears that one of the algorithms in {{cite|JowhariG-05}} may work when edges can be deleted. Is it possible to match the insert-only bounds when edges are inserted and deleted? | Given a stream in which edges are inserted and deleted to/from an unweighted, undirected graph, how well can we count triangles and other sub-graphs? Most of the previous work has focussed on the case of insertions {{cite|BarYossefKS-02|JowhariG-05|BuriolFLMS-06}} although it appears that one of the algorithms in {{cite|JowhariG-05}} may work when edges can be deleted. Is it possible to match the insert-only bounds when edges are inserted and deleted? |
Revision as of 05:05, 16 November 2012
Suggested by | Stefano Leonardi |
---|---|
Source | Kanpur 2006 |
Short link | https://sublinear.info/11 |
Given a stream in which edges are inserted and deleted to/from an unweighted, undirected graph, how well can we count triangles and other sub-graphs? Most of the previous work has focussed on the case of insertions [BarYossefKS-02,JowhariG-05,BuriolFLMS-06] although it appears that one of the algorithms in [JowhariG-05] may work when edges can be deleted. Is it possible to match the insert-only bounds when edges are inserted and deleted?