Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:74"
m |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* A randomized data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any cut value (or Rayleigh quotient) in $G$, which is more space-efficient than the known graphical representation, can be found in {{cite|AndoniCKQWZ-16}}. | * A randomized data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any cut value (or Rayleigh quotient) in $G$, which is more space-efficient than the known graphical representation, can be found in {{cite|AndoniCKQWZ-16}}. | ||
| − | * For a given graph $G$ with $k$ terminals, the exact values of all the minimum cuts between subsets of terminals can be stored simply as a list of $2^k$ numbers. The best graphical representation known is of size roughly $2^{2^k}$ {{cite|HagerupKNR-98 | + | * For a given graph $G$ with $k$ terminals, the exact values of all the minimum cuts between subsets of terminals can be stored simply as a list of $2^k$ numbers. The best graphical representation known is of size roughly $2^{2^k}$ {{cite|HagerupKNR-98|KhanR-14}}. |
* A deterministic data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any multicommodity flow on a set of $k$ given terminals in $G$. There is no known graphical representation for this, whose size depends on $k$ and $\varepsilon$, but not on $G$ {{cite|AndoniGK-14}}. | * A deterministic data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any multicommodity flow on a set of $k$ given terminals in $G$. There is no known graphical representation for this, whose size depends on $k$ and $\varepsilon$, but not on $G$ {{cite|AndoniGK-14}}. | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 16 January 2016
| Suggested by | Robert Krauthgamer |
|---|---|
| Source | Baltimore 2016 |
| Short link | https://sublinear.info/74 |
Suppose we want to design a data structure that stores, for a given edge-weighted (undirected) graph $G = (V,E_G,w_G)$, the values of the minimum $st$-cuts for all $s,t \in V$. A naive method is to construct a table containing the value for each pair, requiring $O(|V|^2)$ space (machine words). Alternatively, one may construct a Gomory–Hu tree [GomoryH-61]. This is a tree $T = (V,E_T,w_T)$, in which the minimum $st$-cut values are equal to those in $G$. Since $T$ is a tree, it requires only $O(|V|)$ space.
Thus for this problem, a very space-efficient data structure (perhaps even the best one) is itself a graph $G'$, and it encodes the desired values in a natural manner, just compute the same function (min $st$-cut) on $G'$. But is this the case for all such functions on graphs, or is there a (natural) case where a potentially complicated data structure outperforms a graphical encoding? The question applies both to exact and approximate computations of the function.
Some relevant examples:
- A randomized data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any cut value (or Rayleigh quotient) in $G$, which is more space-efficient than the known graphical representation, can be found in [AndoniCKQWZ-16].
- For a given graph $G$ with $k$ terminals, the exact values of all the minimum cuts between subsets of terminals can be stored simply as a list of $2^k$ numbers. The best graphical representation known is of size roughly $2^{2^k}$ [HagerupKNR-98,KhanR-14].
- A deterministic data structure for $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating any multicommodity flow on a set of $k$ given terminals in $G$. There is no known graphical representation for this, whose size depends on $k$ and $\varepsilon$, but not on $G$ [AndoniGK-14].
