Difference between revisions of "Open Problems:64"
m |
(Fixing a citation) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header | {{Header | ||
| − | |||
|source=bertinoro14 | |source=bertinoro14 | ||
|who=Andrew McGregor | |who=Andrew McGregor | ||
}} | }} | ||
Consider an unweighted graph on $n$ nodes defined by a stream of edge insertions and deletions. Is it possible to approximate the size of the maximum cardinality matching up to constant factor given a single pass and $o(n^2)$ space? Recall that a factor 2 approximation is easy in $O(n \log n)$ space if there are no edge deletions. | Consider an unweighted graph on $n$ nodes defined by a stream of edge insertions and deletions. Is it possible to approximate the size of the maximum cardinality matching up to constant factor given a single pass and $o(n^2)$ space? Recall that a factor 2 approximation is easy in $O(n \log n)$ space if there are no edge deletions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Updates == | ||
| + | The question is fully settled when the goal is to output the edges of an approximate maximum matching: to obtain an $\alpha$-approximation to maximum matching in dynamic streams, $\Omega(n^2/\alpha^3)$ space is necessary {{cite|AssadiKLY-16}} and $\widetilde{O}(n^2/\alpha^3)$ space is sufficient {{cite|AssadiKLY-16|ChitnisCEHMMV-16}}. When the goal is only to estimate the value of maximum matching (as opposed to finding the edges), $\Omega(n/\alpha^2)$ space is necessary and $\widetilde{O}(n^2/\alpha^4)$ space is sufficient {{cite|AssadiKL-17}}. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:01, 28 April 2017
| Suggested by | Andrew McGregor |
|---|---|
| Source | Bertinoro 2014 |
| Short link | https://sublinear.info/64 |
Consider an unweighted graph on $n$ nodes defined by a stream of edge insertions and deletions. Is it possible to approximate the size of the maximum cardinality matching up to constant factor given a single pass and $o(n^2)$ space? Recall that a factor 2 approximation is easy in $O(n \log n)$ space if there are no edge deletions.
Updates[edit]
The question is fully settled when the goal is to output the edges of an approximate maximum matching: to obtain an $\alpha$-approximation to maximum matching in dynamic streams, $\Omega(n^2/\alpha^3)$ space is necessary [AssadiKLY-16] and $\widetilde{O}(n^2/\alpha^3)$ space is sufficient [AssadiKLY-16,ChitnisCEHMMV-16]. When the goal is only to estimate the value of maximum matching (as opposed to finding the edges), $\Omega(n/\alpha^2)$ space is necessary and $\widetilde{O}(n^2/\alpha^4)$ space is sufficient [AssadiKL-17].
